HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: New 43-101 explanation? - Peter.
6
Mar 22, 2010 02:29PM
19
Mar 22, 2010 02:35PM
7
Mar 22, 2010 02:41PM
7
Mar 22, 2010 02:45PM
7
Mar 22, 2010 03:39PM
5
Mar 22, 2010 03:47PM
4
Mar 22, 2010 04:11PM
4
Mar 22, 2010 04:22PM
5
Mar 22, 2010 04:47PM
2
Mar 22, 2010 04:58PM
9
Mar 22, 2010 05:02PM
6
Mar 22, 2010 05:06PM
5
Mar 22, 2010 05:12PM
3
Mar 22, 2010 05:15PM

I am a little confused by the direct shipping of 3% Ni, where are they shipping it? I have a hard time believing a smelter would be able to do anything with it (and I can't seamt to find Hoov's post). I am not 100% but I believe typical concentrate grades (shipped to a smelter) would be in the vicinity of 30-50% Ni. Would the direct shipping be to a concentrator in Sudbury, and anything over 3% is uneconomical to ship?

Not saying it is impossible but I have never heard of a mine that ships ore 1000 km to be concentrated by someone else. It means the mine would be paying to ship 9700 t of waste for every 300t of Ni. I would prefer a more traditional plan that mines at a .5-1% cutoff and concentrates on site. Seems to me this would avoid substantial costs and logistical headaches especially if the deposit ends up being deeper then 1200m

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply