Free
Message: Re: Doni Re: PACER Samsung/ Minister stated key words are "in this lawsuit"
12
Apr 03, 2009 08:55AM
1
Apr 03, 2009 09:00AM
4
Apr 03, 2009 09:02AM
1
Apr 03, 2009 09:06AM
1
Apr 03, 2009 09:07AM
6
Apr 03, 2009 09:17AM
8
Apr 03, 2009 09:22AM

Apr 03, 2009 09:26AM
1
Apr 03, 2009 09:31AM

Apr 03, 2009 09:33AM

Apr 03, 2009 09:35AM
1
Apr 03, 2009 09:39AM
1
Apr 03, 2009 09:40AM
4
Apr 03, 2009 10:02AM
1
Apr 03, 2009 11:35AM

Apr 03, 2009 11:53AM
2
Apr 03, 2009 12:23PM
7
Apr 03, 2009 02:13PM
3
Apr 03, 2009 02:32PM
2
Moo
Apr 03, 2009 02:36PM
13
Apr 03, 2009 06:42PM
4
Apr 03, 2009 08:11PM
6
Apr 03, 2009 08:25PM
2
Apr 03, 2009 11:52PM
25
Apr 04, 2009 06:16AM

Apr 04, 2009 06:32AM
1
Apr 04, 2009 06:35AM

Apr 04, 2009 06:48AM

Apr 04, 2009 07:11AM
2
Apr 04, 2009 07:17AM
20
Apr 04, 2009 07:22AM
2
Apr 04, 2009 07:33AM
6
Apr 04, 2009 07:36AM
4
Apr 04, 2009 07:39AM

Apr 04, 2009 07:46AM
1
Apr 04, 2009 07:50AM
1
Apr 04, 2009 08:03AM
3
Apr 04, 2009 08:05AM
1
Apr 04, 2009 08:10AM
3
Apr 04, 2009 08:11AM
1
Apr 04, 2009 08:30AM

Apr 04, 2009 08:40AM

Apr 04, 2009 08:58AM
3
Apr 04, 2009 08:58AM
1
Apr 04, 2009 09:00AM
1
Apr 04, 2009 09:05AM

Apr 04, 2009 09:06AM
4
Apr 04, 2009 09:10AM
2
Apr 04, 2009 09:24AM
4
Apr 04, 2009 09:26AM
2
Apr 04, 2009 09:29AM
2
Apr 04, 2009 09:32AM

Apr 04, 2009 11:12AM
9
Apr 04, 2009 11:17AM

Apr 04, 2009 11:38AM
5
Apr 04, 2009 11:42AM
2
Apr 04, 2009 02:49PM
2
Apr 04, 2009 02:55PM
1
Apr 04, 2009 02:56PM
13
Apr 04, 2009 03:22PM
2
Apr 04, 2009 03:23PM
4
Apr 04, 2009 03:42PM

Apr 04, 2009 04:05PM

Apr 04, 2009 04:23PM
2
Apr 04, 2009 05:46PM
3
Apr 04, 2009 05:53PM
2
Apr 04, 2009 07:49PM

Apr 04, 2009 07:57PM
3
Apr 04, 2009 08:30PM
5
Apr 05, 2009 05:01AM
2
Apr 06, 2009 03:30AM

Re: Doni Re: PACER Samsung/ Minister stated key words are "in this lawsuit"

posted on Apr 06, 2009 06:05PM

In a nutshell, LL, are you suggesting that perhaps Samsung (should they settle or litigate this one) could be positioning themselves that in the event they do decide to settle, they don't want the possibility of the other patents coming up in the 'downstream' or 'upstream' companies to be named in Tier 2 (or later)?



In this case, they would rather say to EDIG (DM) now, 'let's get it done now, if we are going to do this (settle), we don't want to be implicated again for the other patents in the future'?

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply