Re: e.DIGITAL response to USPTO re " 774 patent" prior art issue ( 4 )
in response to
by
posted on
Jan 06, 2012 01:01PM
Now this I like:
APPLICANT WILL AMEND CLAIMS TO INCLUDE LIMITATION THAT WILL EXPRESSLY STATE THAT THE FLASH MEMORY IS THE SOLE MEMORY TO STORE THE RECEIVED PROCESSED SOUND ELECTRICAL SIGNAL. EXAMINER AGREED THAT SUCH ALIMITATION WOULD OVERCOME SCHRODER AND SHE WOULD UPDATE SEARCH ACCORDINGLY.
Coyote