Free
Message: Re: e.DIGITAL response to USPTO re " 774 patent" prior art issue ( 4 )
4
Jan 06, 2012 11:30AM
7
Jan 06, 2012 11:42AM
3
Jan 07, 2012 10:58AM
3
Jan 07, 2012 11:06AM

"APPLICANT WILL AMEND CLAIMS TO INCLUDE LIMITATION THAT WILL EXPRESSLY STATE THAT THE FLASH MEMORY IS THE SOLE MEMORY TO STORE THE RECEIVED PROCESSED SOUND ELECTRICAL SIGNAL. EXAMINER AGREED THAT SUCH ALIMITATION WOULD OVERCOME SCHRODER AND SHE WOULD UPDATE SEARCH ACCORDINGLY."

When can reexamination strengthen a patent?

Given that the patent is likely to emerge from reexamination, the patent that emerges will enjoy a presumption of validity over all the cited art and may include claims that are significantly harder to invalidate during litigation. Furthermore, the patent that emerges from reexamination may be perceived as having “survived” a validity challenge and a court or jury may be reluctant to invalidate the patent during subsequent litigation."

9
Jan 09, 2012 10:14AM
9
Jan 09, 2012 04:30PM
7
Jan 09, 2012 04:42PM
7
Jan 09, 2012 04:51PM
6
Jan 09, 2012 04:57PM
4
Jan 09, 2012 05:06PM
3
Jan 09, 2012 05:23PM
6
Jan 09, 2012 05:37PM
5
Jan 09, 2012 06:35PM
3
Jan 09, 2012 07:26PM
4
Jan 09, 2012 07:55PM
3
Jan 09, 2012 08:05PM
1
Jan 09, 2012 08:27PM
2
Jan 09, 2012 08:49PM
5
Jan 10, 2012 04:51PM
1
Jan 10, 2012 04:54PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply