Re: Pacer: e.DIGITAL v. Toshiba - Defendant must answer on or before March 20, 2014
posted on
Jan 29, 2014 07:48PM
I would agree, so I don't see how it would be possible for the defendants to take the CE into account when responding to the motion. I still believe it is as Handal has said ... to give time to reach a resolution and not to delay .