Not doing anything or have any facts to back it up doesn't mean it's not a good asset. I'm still open to that this project may pay out down the road.

I just turned your own question back on yourself so you would get my point - facts are not available.

Whereas, you first claimed it was a good project, then you say because they are not doing anything significant there, it's not a good project.

Do you see why you got banned? You consistently support and challenge everything that's positive within Copper Fox. You're not clear on what you want to express and you end up arguing with many posters here. We know you're not trying to offend anyone here but it's very difficult to see where you stand and what you're trying to say.

===========================

I think you misread my post as I didn't think I said SB was a good project. I went though my posts to try and find what you were referring to. Maybe this is it:

• We are just discussing the stock. When Sombrerro Butte was aquired there was plans to test it further (Titan survey, I think). As far as I can see, and please correct if Im wrong - we have really made no progress on that part of desert fox. All the focus has been on VD, which is fine.
  
  I assume they took a closer look at SB and havent thrown money at it. There has been little news or progress regarding SB. Maybe it is a good asset, we have no info. Have they made the next installment payment, I dont know. I am making assumptions, not pretending to know anything as fact.
  
  Im happy with any reduction in spending and everything they do to conserve cash.
  
  It seems they bought it cheap, looked closer and havent proceeded further because it isnt worth the further expense. At least it seems that way to me. It would be smart to abandon something that doesnt look stellar.

Is this what you are referring to? What in the above post is a reason for me being banned? I'm not trying to force my opinion as truth? I really just said "maybe its good, maybe its not" to paraphrase.

We do now know they did make the payment, so it isn't being abandoned.

After all we have been through, I guess I take issue with posters trying to escalate thier speculations as fact when nothing we know is settled. I sure don't.

You mention that its difficult to see where I stand - it may be because I have an open mind and discussion here molds my opinion on a regular basis. Prospekt is really sharp and a lot of what she says is plausible/logical. Others too.

I DON'T know anything for sure! I am a skeptic, but how can I have an agenda when its not even clear where I stand? Debate and discussion - what else are we here for? How can we test out our speculations without putting them out there? This is a discussionboard after all. I don't know how to be more clear on that.

When someone attacks another poster's position with self-assumed facts or states "its been settled" or takes a superior tone I point out we dont know or the other side of the coin, and its been proven over and over - we really don't know much - AT ALL...

We shouldn't be lulled into thinking speculation is fact just because a few posters on the board agree. We shouldn't get bent out of shape because someone challenges their assumptions either, don't you think? Why the hostility? I try and treat everyone respectfully - including you.