Is this what you are referring to? What in the above post is a reason for me being banned? I'm not trying to force my opinion as truth? I really just said "maybe its good, maybe its not" to paraphrase.

We do now know they did make the payment, so it isn't being abandoned.

After all we have been through, I guess I take issue with posters trying to escalate thier speculations as fact when nothing we know is settled. I sure don't.

You mention that its difficult to see where I stand - it may be because I have an open mind and discussion here molds my opinion on a regular basis. Prospekt is really sharp and a lot of what she says is plausible/logical. Others too.

I DON'T know anything for sure! I am a skeptic, but how can I have an agenda when its not even clear where I stand? Debate and discussion - what else are we here for? How can we test out our speculations without putting them out there? This is a discussionboard after all. I don't know how to be more clear on that.

When someone attacks another poster's position with self-assumed facts or states "its been settled" or takes a superior tone I point out we dont know or the other side of the coin, and its been proven over and over - we really don't know much - AT ALL...

We shouldn't be lulled into thinking speculation is fact just because a few posters on the board agree. We shouldn't get bent out of shape because someone challenges their assumptions either, don't you think? Why the hostility? I try and treat everyone respectfully - including you.

I never said your above post is a reason for you to be banned. I do appreciate your skepticism of everything which helps me in seeing the flaws of the company.

I never said your have an agenda...unless you do? I wasn't being hostile unless you want me to. I was suggesting that your comments throws people off. I guess we can agree that Somberto can be good or bad especially when we have no data on it.

You need to understand that everyone posting here are shareholders of Copper Fox. They want nothing but positives in the company so they can make money or in my case make my money back and more. So feeling some hostility from certain posters is normal especially when someone is trying to challenge the positives of the company that poster invested in.

So what I wanted to say that to prevent yourself from getting banned again, maybe double check what you say instead?

It seems they bought it cheap, looked closer and havent proceeded further because it isnt worth the further expense. At least it seems that way to me. It would be smart to abandon something that doesnt look stellar.

Please tell me that this is not a big statement? Why would say it's not worth further expense? Right after you said it might be a good asset? How do you know it's not stellar?

But I do agree with some of your comments such as conserving cash. So if you say that's a reason to no spend any money on Somberto. GREAT! I agree with you as well!