Re: lambertslunatics / Re: non-financial result
in response to
by
posted on
Apr 18, 2008 09:08AM
The next step:
If the J3 are now with TPL/PTSC for the '584 Appeal, might it not then follow that such a scenario would make it so much easier to persuade ARM not only to reach a stipulated decision as to the legal definition(Markman) of the current term under appeal, but more importantly to get some fees from ARM: $x for past infringement/license, PLUS y% of every chip sold going forward(Gross reported revenue). Remember, a PATENT trumps a COPYRIGHT every time.
This would release ARM from any liability to their customers and give PTSC a continuing revenue stream until patent expiry.
Both sides could be "pleased" with the resolution of their differences.
A non-financial result has become a financial result and PTSC was fully compliant in reporting for the recent Q filing.
Be well