Re: "Meteor Impact" - JD...sneezer...
in response to
by
posted on
Dec 23, 2007 11:55AM
NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)
Of course I'm attempting to get caught up on my reading.
Now I'm at the spot where snezzeer is asking John for credentials? Am I reading that right snezzer?
If this is so I would highly recommend that you stay away from the Mcfauld's Lake board Snezzer. You are hanging around in bad company and you are picking up silly habits.
You can't be that nieve since you managed to make it to president on the boards here.
You made president yet I can't find one of your posts that is anywhere near as informative as any one of John Defeurs. I am not on his mailing list, nore are we friends but I do appreciate the work he puts into his posts. Like Poly said, you don't have to agree with everything he says but give lots of credit where lots of credit is due.
If John has a question he will research the answer which usually entails discussing the issue with an expert in that particular field. He isn't guessing. He gets the same info as I and we both get it in different ways.
The guys up here are going with the meteor hypothesis. There isn't even any argument.......Don