"You want me to apologize to you for posting a response to your message that I/we believe is incorrect? I think that would be very disingenuous of me to do so. Because I don’t believe there is anything to apologize for? I am sorry that you have apparently been offended by my or Rainer’s response. I don’t really understand why."

**************************************************************************

Yes, yes I do and in fact to the entire forum. And I"ll explain shall I FJ.

To refresh, what I said: ..."

as for Sept. 2016 articles, well at this point we really cannot predict anything at this point. To do so would only be folly and frankly, I think we've visited that once too many times.

Currentyly we are in mystery mode.....we don't know what/when or may/may not happen. Sure, one can make all sorts of *assumptions/predictions* some even make projections, but until we read it in B&W (black and white OR whatever your font colour is) nothing, nothing can be taken for granted..."

**************************************************************************

*******************************************************

This is really why A*Star is funding the majority of the cost to develop POET’s smart pixel applications

I have looked at the news release, the Q1 MD&A as well as the Financials and cannot see anywhere that shows a break-down of cost for the agreement with A*Star. Where do you see this information?

And in a few short posts later on you say:

*******************************************************

" Unfortunately Disco I can't really comment on where that info originated from. But my understanding is the deal was facilitated at such good terms as a result of Subhash that he was awarded options as a result. It cost them a fraction of what was being offered outside of Singapore. 250k options awarded to Subhash...well spent. Sorry I can't be more definitive in my response. "

******************************************************