Please name the hypsters or members of the glee club as you see it.

What utter nonsense. When someone invests their money in something they perceived as undervalued and then wants to discuss it in order to point out the real value as they see it, they are attacked as hypsters.

Half of an investment is perception...which has value. How do companies that lose money even have a pps that is positive, asset value aside?

Of all the stocks that have appreciated in value this year, do you think their investors are focused on the negatives or the positives, the potential of business climate improvement or the downside?

"A freakin' glee club..."

Odds are that the pps moves north much faster when investors are singing about their investment rather than whining, as we have all witnessed.

If you had been told two years ago that EDIG would be profitable with solid prospects for continued growth, would that have been hyping?

There is a very good reason EDIG's pps is where it is currently, and it's not due to its current financials.