Free
Message: Re: EDIG SHORT INTEREST DROPPED FROM CLOSE TO 50 P- doni...
7
Moo
Apr 01, 2009 04:48AM
4
Apr 01, 2009 06:46AM
9
Apr 01, 2009 06:52AM
4
Apr 01, 2009 06:58AM
5
Apr 01, 2009 07:02AM
2
Apr 01, 2009 07:04AM
4
Apr 01, 2009 07:08AM
3
Apr 01, 2009 07:08AM
8
Apr 01, 2009 07:14AM
9
Apr 01, 2009 07:34AM
1
Apr 01, 2009 07:48AM
1
Apr 01, 2009 07:50AM
3
Apr 01, 2009 08:01AM
1
Apr 01, 2009 08:02AM
2
Apr 01, 2009 08:06AM
1
Apr 01, 2009 08:11AM
1
Apr 01, 2009 09:25AM

Apr 01, 2009 09:38AM

Apr 02, 2009 10:08AM

Gil...

what I'm understanding is

1. e.Digital can only introduce different claims in the future

2. Samsung would have to defend with different infringement counter claims or as you note..."NON-INFRINGMENT CLAIMS ARE BANNED, NOW AND FOR THE FUTURE..."

3. Samsungs claims of INVALIDITY are still alive and can be used.

I'm trying to figure out where the blow connects for DM?

The only thing I could equate to the above , there was a strategy on DM's part in supplying sacrificial claims....that inadverantly drew out more defence claims that could not be used in the future.

doni







=





1
Apr 02, 2009 12:15PM
6
Apr 02, 2009 03:35PM
2
Apr 02, 2009 04:25PM
11
Apr 02, 2009 09:45PM

Apr 03, 2009 07:23AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply