Free
Message: Re: Samsung settlement../ key point my observation/Gil /Doni
3
Nov 16, 2009 10:02PM
9
Nov 16, 2009 10:38PM

Nov 16, 2009 10:43PM
4
Nov 16, 2009 10:54PM

Nov 16, 2009 11:00PM
3
Nov 16, 2009 11:05PM
17
Nov 17, 2009 03:44PM

Nov 17, 2009 03:53PM

Nov 17, 2009 04:14PM

Nov 17, 2009 04:18PM

Re: Samsung settlement../ key point my observation/Gil /Doni

in response to by
posted on Nov 17, 2009 04:31PM

tier one filings are being directed at companies we believe infringe mainly on key claims within the '774 patent whereas tier two cases are expected to be filed against companies we believe infringe on specific claims within the Flash-R™ patent portfolio pertaining to fundamental techniques in utilizing flash memory (embedded or removable). DB

from edigital Q2 2010 Financials :

Revenues included of $1.25 Million in licensing fees from the company's flash-R TM patent portfolio.

Gil / Doni or anybody

according to the above tier one 774 patent tier two Flash -R. Samsung is tier one the Q says flash -R so now I think and agree with Gil Samsung is not included since samsung is tier one and the Q say Licensing which is from tier two . I am right or I am missing something?

TIA

and GLTA

3
Nov 17, 2009 04:46PM
4
Nov 17, 2009 04:48PM

Nov 17, 2009 04:55PM

Nov 17, 2009 04:57PM

Nov 17, 2009 05:02PM

Nov 17, 2009 05:08PM
1
Nov 17, 2009 05:16PM
1
Nov 17, 2009 05:49PM
2
Nov 17, 2009 06:09PM

Nov 17, 2009 06:20PM

Nov 17, 2009 06:55PM

Nov 17, 2009 07:06PM

Nov 17, 2009 07:29PM
2
Nov 17, 2009 07:37PM
1
Nov 17, 2009 07:42PM
5
Nov 17, 2009 08:38PM
3
Nov 17, 2009 08:42PM

Nov 17, 2009 09:12PM

Nov 18, 2009 08:13AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply