Free
Message: Re: PACER..Dischino..Cra... No../HATARI
15
Sep 12, 2011 09:10PM
4
Sep 12, 2011 09:17PM
1
Sep 12, 2011 10:50PM
4
Sep 12, 2011 10:55PM
2
Sep 12, 2011 11:04PM
11
Sep 12, 2011 11:18PM
9
Sep 13, 2011 02:11AM
5
Sep 13, 2011 05:06AM
5
Sep 13, 2011 09:39AM
1
Sep 13, 2011 10:23AM
3
Sep 13, 2011 10:38AM
6
Sep 13, 2011 10:52AM
4
Sep 13, 2011 11:11AM
6
Sep 13, 2011 04:17PM
13
Sep 13, 2011 07:39PM
2
Sep 13, 2011 08:10PM
6
Sep 13, 2011 11:14PM
4
Sep 13, 2011 11:32PM
4
Sep 14, 2011 12:45AM
3
Sep 14, 2011 08:56AM
4
Sep 14, 2011 10:01AM
4
Sep 14, 2011 10:47AM
7
Sep 14, 2011 10:54AM

"This was based on my conversation with Fred at SHM. I hope you are right. They are leaving an appeal on the table. Not clear if they will go throught with it.'

You seem a fair minded poster...

For your conversation with Fred, were you able to get a feel for what....

RE: 8K..."The Opinion construes claim terms in United States Patent 5,491,774, one of the Company’s Flash-R patents, more narrowly than proposed by the Company. The Company is evaluating with counsel the impact of the opinion on the litigation."

e.Digital had a proposal of claims construction, even though e.Digital did not get what it was proposing, would the courts consideration be detrimental to e.Digitals case with regard to that which is published in the patent?

IMO, appealing a proposal is not appeal-able...where e.Digital seems only concerned with that issue.

doni

doni

4
Sep 16, 2011 12:43PM
3
Sep 16, 2011 12:53PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply