Re: PACER..Dischino..Cra... No../HATARI
in response to
by
posted on
Sep 15, 2011 03:14PM
"more narrowly than proposed "
Does that not indicate, while more narrow the interpretation, it is still in play, thus having value, to a lessor degree perhaps. So it will continue to move forward.
The Q will indicate if the dollar amounts are significantly different or not than the pre-ruling settlement numbers.
If not, we are still looking at 150+ yet unnamed infringers with a net to EDIG.