Free
Message: Re: PACER..Dischino..Cra... No../HATARI--doni
15
Sep 12, 2011 09:10PM
4
Sep 12, 2011 09:17PM
1
Sep 12, 2011 10:50PM
4
Sep 12, 2011 10:55PM
2
Sep 12, 2011 11:04PM
11
Sep 12, 2011 11:18PM
9
Sep 13, 2011 02:11AM
5
Sep 13, 2011 05:06AM
5
Sep 13, 2011 09:39AM
1
Sep 13, 2011 10:23AM
3
Sep 13, 2011 10:38AM
6
Sep 13, 2011 10:52AM
4
Sep 13, 2011 11:11AM
6
Sep 13, 2011 04:17PM
13
Sep 13, 2011 07:39PM
2
Sep 13, 2011 08:10PM
6
Sep 13, 2011 11:14PM
4
Sep 13, 2011 11:32PM
4
Sep 14, 2011 12:45AM
3
Sep 14, 2011 08:56AM
4
Sep 14, 2011 10:01AM
4
Sep 14, 2011 10:47AM
7
Sep 14, 2011 10:54AM

just trying to figure this thing out.

1. Does Judge K's seemingly somewhat negative ruling against EDIG follow to other defendants and venues?

2. Does her ruling not follow if 737 is not decided on and what she said about 747 is left open ended so to speak?

3. Did the Judge decide to not rule on 737 so that all would settle thus in someway be doing her job?

4. It would seem to me that either the defendants or the plaintiff would WANT an answer. Since EDIG seems happy to settle for less than maximum and "get out of Dodge" why don't the defendants want to push the Judge for an answer and have a more definitive win?

4
Sep 16, 2011 12:43PM
3
Sep 16, 2011 12:53PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply