Re: for teddy
in response to
by
posted on
Nov 18, 2015 08:47AM
"its grind it out and see if the little guy can hold old."
That's for sure...
The "we believe" is an optimistic comment knowing that, unless the court keeps us in business we will be driven into the ground with our patents and platform and nothing else matters.
With that, anyone can pick on any of the 10K results regarding any information reported in them....it just does not matter.
As for other, supposed, technical comments... as would a , should a ...it just does not matter.
As to comments FF show us!! ...it just does not matter. ..it's out of his hands.
The very first patent in the NUNCHI platform, as alluded to in minutes of the claims hearing is at stake here....and the balance of patents lean on it.
A judge is now in charge of e.Digitals fate....as to the scope of language. We either have something that is all encompassing...or we have something that is limited to a certain condition. You can bet your bottom dollar they did not compose the claims... to limit the ability of the claims... to a condition the defendants consider.
If e.Digital is discounted out of the claims ruling....the USPTO is a complete joke by allowing all the patents that have been approved.
Where Congress has now further lent a hand in obstruction regarding, what I see as, circumstantial conformity, that companies must now over come.
As for the IPR's, there is no straight out prior art, and defendants rely on a circumstantial collection of cobbled bits and pieces to make their arguments.
Realistically know what you own and forget what you think should be, it just does not matter.
There is no other issue to compare this to....it's a one of a kind... win or lose.
doni