Tracy, I have a couple of unanswered questions from the last few weeks.  If addressed, the answers were unclear, so please indulge me.  

1)  Does LBSR have all the land usage rights required to get equipment and personnel from the public highway south of Tombstone to the drilling targets in the Hay Mountain area?  I ask because I know that there are private properties in the area, as well as topographic, ecological, and archeological limitations that may complicate access.  https://agoracom.com/ir/libertystar/forums/discussion/topics/736279-adjoining-land-useage-rights/messages/2256156#message

2)  What is the nature of Dr. Wilson's compensation?  The first PR about him said that he was "engaged" to find potential partners.  Another referred to him as a consultant in regards to his interpretation of ZTEM (subject to a formalized later re-interpretation).  So the nature of his "engagement" is unclear.  More importantly, what does he cost us?  https://agoracom.com/ir/libertystar/forums/discussion/topics/736160-alan-wilson/messages/2255838#message  

3)  Here is another issue that has not been addressed.  Why was not the latest ZTEM interpretation 43-101 compliant?  I think I read here that it was not necessary for seeking a partner, but even if that may be acceptable in some quarters - doubtful, in my opinion -, it is very important for knowledgable stock buyers/sellers.  Adding those words to a PR costs nothing.  Not including them, then, has to be seen as either an oversight or an intentional omission.  Also, Dr. Wilson's background as provided by LBSR omits the fact that he recently identified himself as a hydrologist upon taking residence in Anguilla, a known center for money laundering.  Was the failure to mention this also an oversight, or intentional omission? 

Thank you.