No expertise needed to post here, but constant bashes from one who not only does not own KRY, but has a vested interest in GRZ doesn't cut it.

I am tired of watching over the past month of Vet espousing expertise on arbitration matters, while he really has no expertise (and which were totally inaccurate statements), and which were just used as a chance to pump his investment -- GRZ -- and dump on that dog that we own.

Everyone is free to post here on what they need to say, but someone with a significant pro-GRZ and anti-KRY bias due to their actual ownership should be clear in their motives. I've sat and watched it for quite a while and said nothing -- that time is over.

I've reinstated several posters of all different sorts of opinion recently, and I personally am peeved at out management for being so gullible, but I will not have those without a stake in this debacle making false statements to further their own investment position, the true meaning of bashing. Action will be taken accordingly, as it has been in the past.