Here's the top 100 electronics firms as of 2010. Still lots of names on there that have never been announced as licensees!

http://www.hardwaretop100.org/hardware-companies-top-100-2010-edition.php

Samsung and LG currently in the sights, but the rest of those serial infringers better step up soon.

More than half of the top 25 remain unsigned as far as we know. Nos. 1, 3, 4, 7, 10, 11, 14, 17, 18, 19, 21, 23, 25 on the list. Just for analysis sake, let's assume these 13 companies paid on average $20M for a license (IMO, that should be a doable figure based on the current status of the MMP). That means $260M in license revenue from those 13 companies ONLY. Let's assume it costs us 35% to bring in those licenses between the 20% cost to Alliacense, and the contingency due to Otteson for at least the Samsung and LG (current NDoC & ITC Litigants), that would leave $169M for PTSC & TPL to split. That's $84.5M for PTSC before tax and overhead considerations.

There are similar ratios of outstanding companies on the next 25 as well, and the remaining 50. Lots of targets and revenue sources.

POTENTIAL!!! Can it be realized? We're closer than we've ever been, perhaps, but it NEEDS TO MATERIALIZE! It would be nice if the company would ACTIVELY support the pps so that WHEN/IF we get that materialization, the pps climb begins from a loftier position than 13 cents.

Communication of the Vision, and Stock Purchases by Insiders would help takes steps in the right direction, IMO.