Free
Message: Re: Yesterday's PR-LL / iam
6
Jan 09, 2009 02:39PM

Jan 09, 2009 03:38PM

Jan 09, 2009 03:54PM
4
Jan 09, 2009 04:12PM

Jan 09, 2009 04:31PM
3
Jan 09, 2009 06:26PM

Jan 10, 2009 07:17AM
4
Jan 10, 2009 08:00AM

Jan 10, 2009 08:31AM
1
Jan 10, 2009 08:40AM

Jan 10, 2009 09:31AM
1
Jan 10, 2009 09:31AM

Jan 10, 2009 09:53AM
9
Jan 10, 2009 09:59AM
2
Jan 10, 2009 01:34PM
6
Jan 10, 2009 02:42PM
2
Jan 10, 2009 02:46PM

Jan 10, 2009 04:28PM

"btw - LG didn't want their name in our PR either."


It could also be that EDIG didn't want LG's name in the PR...


Remember how some here were disappointed when we did find out through PACER it was LG and EDIG settled for 'only' 1.6M?



How did the PPS react upon the news of the first announcement, then it was discovered who settled, and for how much?


(With many who were upset forgetting that it was said the first would get a deep discount, but subsequent licenses would not get as much of a 'discount'.)



Jan 10, 2009 07:15PM
1
Jan 11, 2009 05:58AM

Jan 11, 2009 06:04AM
3
Jan 11, 2009 11:26AM

Jan 11, 2009 02:09PM

Jan 11, 2009 04:46PM
2
Jan 11, 2009 04:48PM
1
Jan 12, 2009 02:57AM
2
Jan 12, 2009 04:38AM
1
Jan 12, 2009 04:44AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply