Free
Message: Re: Yesterday's PR-LL / iam / lake
6
Jan 09, 2009 02:39PM

Jan 09, 2009 03:38PM

Jan 09, 2009 03:54PM
4
Jan 09, 2009 04:12PM

Jan 09, 2009 04:31PM
3
Jan 09, 2009 06:26PM

Jan 10, 2009 07:17AM
4
Jan 10, 2009 08:00AM

Jan 10, 2009 08:31AM
1
Jan 10, 2009 08:40AM

Jan 10, 2009 09:31AM
1
Jan 10, 2009 09:31AM

Jan 10, 2009 09:53AM
9
Jan 10, 2009 09:59AM
2
Jan 10, 2009 01:34PM
6
Jan 10, 2009 02:42PM
2
Jan 10, 2009 02:46PM

Jan 10, 2009 04:28PM
1
Jan 10, 2009 07:08PM

Jan 10, 2009 07:15PM
1
Jan 11, 2009 05:58AM

Jan 11, 2009 06:04AM
3
Jan 11, 2009 11:26AM

Jan 11, 2009 02:09PM

Jan 11, 2009 04:46PM
2
Jan 11, 2009 04:48PM
1
Jan 12, 2009 02:57AM

There's nothing wrong with us having / building a name, but the whole discussion was based around another posters question question: "what's the point?" regarding why infringer's would not want their names in the news release announcing a settlement, and would in fact negotiate that as part of the settlement.

Coyote

2
Jan 12, 2009 04:38AM
1
Jan 12, 2009 04:44AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply