Your comments cover this topic very well, as do the thoughts, experience and opinions of others, but my question remains, what have these WINS done for PTSC's PPS?
One could also say in all fairness, what have these SETTLEMENTS (that I still call a WIN) done for EDIG's PPS?
It was very clear at the SHM, that management is not but slightly interested in a long drawn out court process, with one or more defendants of the 19 filed upon per the PR Nov 3rd. RP expressed the goal was to settle...period.
Ask anyone who was there.....
Read sman998's notes on this topic posted by emit in Link Library dated Nov 20th.
I do not disagree that a day may come, be it in this 18 left or the next DM group, or a DM group plus a group from soon to be law firm # 2 handling the DM conflict cases, should they be T1 or T2 level infringers, that we may end up in a Markman, a trial, and a patent re-exam. Fine, I'll believe it when I see it, and deal with it when it happens. In the mean time, EDIG is not PTSC and DM is not PTL (?). The strategy is different and it is very obvious to this observer as it is many here.
My comments are NOT directed at you 1942, but generic to the topic itself expressed well by many. We wait and see....we are great at waiting capiche..lol.
