Free
Message: Re: bottom line
7
Dec 31, 2009 06:58PM
5
Jan 01, 2010 07:29PM
11
Jan 04, 2010 09:15AM
11
Jan 04, 2010 09:26AM
9
Jan 04, 2010 10:50AM
11
Jan 04, 2010 11:56AM
9
Jan 04, 2010 01:09PM
3
Jan 04, 2010 01:43PM
5
Jan 04, 2010 02:02PM
8
Jan 04, 2010 10:12PM
2
Jan 05, 2010 03:02AM
7
Jan 05, 2010 09:38AM

Re: bottom line

posted on Jan 05, 2010 10:00AM

"He knew he had no chance of winning and all he wanted to do was tie us down and cause us to waste our money on legal fees.'

Now put 41 companies around your neck and try and support that action...

Edig settled 7 and now have 34 collectively in the oven.

If defendants decide, if it's legal to do so, to act in some form of collective action against e.Digital, e.digitals patents had better be iron clad.

These large groupings endorse to yet another degree for me of DM's involvement. IMO, there would be an incentive to collaborate on the part of defendants in protecting their IC source affiliations.

doni

5
Jan 05, 2010 01:14PM
3
Jan 05, 2010 01:34PM
4
Jan 05, 2010 02:39PM
5
Jan 05, 2010 07:21PM
3
Jan 05, 2010 07:44PM
2
Jan 05, 2010 07:46PM
.15
1
Jan 05, 2010 07:53PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply