"Asking the questions really puts the infringers in a catch 22 situation.'

Plaintiffs are showing the court they can shorten the case and not congest the system with nonsense.

There's only one reason not to answer the questions. The defendants understand perfectly well what infringes and what does not.

They also understand what happens when a non volatile memory entity is removed or truncated during a file execution. When they answer the questions pertaining to their particular circumstance, they better have a reason for this ability that is indifferent to e.Digital.....which I would say all devices have been tested prior. It's just a matter of deriving how they get to that end.

Even though they answer the questions, e.Digital know what hardware is present on a PCB.

doni