opty / Re: Now I Understand How You And Some Others Think
in response to
by
posted on
Mar 15, 2011 08:04PM
Yes that's my interpretation, otherwise, it seems there would be no NEED for a PR, as the agreements would take care of the disposition of funds, and funding of the working capital back to the prescribed ranges. The PR to me represents a deviation from the original agreements, and the SUBSTANTIAL qualifier implies serious change, IMO.