Free
Message: Re: Law360 Full Article...Kirkland - richardo insince
16
Aug 25, 2009 02:21PM
5
Aug 25, 2009 02:43PM
5
Aug 25, 2009 02:45PM
2
Aug 25, 2009 02:48PM

Aug 25, 2009 05:15PM
1
Aug 25, 2009 05:54PM

Aug 25, 2009 06:04PM
1
Aug 25, 2009 06:38PM
9
Aug 27, 2009 04:44AM
7
Aug 27, 2009 11:33AM
2
Aug 27, 2009 12:15PM

Aug 27, 2009 12:20PM
1
Aug 27, 2009 01:07PM
1
Aug 27, 2009 01:56PM

The question is not about how it would contribute to the pps.

It's about what value we would like to see from Samsung to consider it acceptable, if it's too low, then why?

Also you have to consider it;s impact on the future infringers for settlement determination.

I think anything less than 10 mil net to edig is a slap in the face, although we don't know the details, how many products, what degree of infringement, how many sales of products, how much time is beoing considered, etc.


Aug 27, 2009 03:20PM
3
Aug 27, 2009 06:38PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply