Re: Pacer - e.DIGITAL v. Seagate Technology - Settlement ! - Dischino
in response to
by
posted on
Dec 31, 2014 10:24AM
During the DM days, TX 7 & CO 19, PR's were issued, but not all of them if memory is correct.
EDIG has never once stated a dollar value, never will IMO, nor any details what so ever, via NDA's be it by EDIG's choice, the defendant or a mutual agreement.
With Handal & Assoc, EDIG did a few then it stopped.
What Fred is doing now regarding your comment that he's waiting then announce in one PR, he is in fact just counting the qty per qtr, then in the 10-Q he'll say such as, "we reached 7 settlements in Q-X with 5 more pending settlement. This brings the latest round of infringement filings to 29 settlements of 41."
Something like that....
A license agreement be it without litigation or with such, is a normal course of business, so the SEC does not require an 8-K, nor a PR.
Now, if EDIG licensed Nunchi or microSignet to a major player for the life of the patents with quarterly dividends, that is something material that impacts EDIG in a BIG way, also IMO the 8-K is a must.
Show us one of these Fred...please!