Re: DM, increase in gross revenue in 2009 thanks to some timely con
in response to
by
posted on
Jun 25, 2010 12:36PM
I can take it.....
I've had plenty of time to get ready....
I read your comments, I know we're on the same page.
Whats the magic number against 16 companies that push it to trial ?
This is way different than the LaserDynamics issue....seems to me all the ducks are in a row. Where for the claims construction to consider, there's not a whole lot to consider between the two, a half dozen points of contention. It also seems, as I read the construction docs, DM has sharpened up through the prior case. I can somewhat see why patents in the prior case were dropped.
Time to pull the trigger as they say...a big # win, if that's the way it goes, would not be overly detrimental on defendants for a judge to have to adjust a final amount.......
16 x ? doesn't seem much to say 100 mill...
And hope the two judges stay involved fully...
FWIW
doni