Welcome To the Copper Fox Metals Inc. HUB On AGORACOM

CUU own 25% Schaft Creek: proven/probable min. reserves/940.8m tonnes = 0.27% copper, 0.19 g/t gold, 0.018% moly and 1.72 g/t silver containing: 5.6b lbs copper, 5.8m ounces gold, 363.5m lbs moly and 51.7m ounces silver; (Recoverable CuEq 0.46%)

Free
Message: Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
9
Feb 07, 2013 10:33AM
9
Feb 07, 2013 10:34AM
18
Feb 07, 2013 10:46AM
3
Feb 07, 2013 10:56AM
10
Feb 07, 2013 11:01AM
22
Feb 07, 2013 11:02AM
5
Feb 07, 2013 11:11AM
4
Feb 07, 2013 11:14AM
4
Feb 07, 2013 11:18AM
32
Feb 07, 2013 11:23AM
4
Feb 07, 2013 11:27AM
6
Feb 07, 2013 11:36AM
8
Feb 07, 2013 11:39AM
3
Feb 07, 2013 11:43AM
13
Feb 07, 2013 11:43AM
17
Feb 07, 2013 11:53AM
3
Feb 07, 2013 12:26PM

Actually the ROV method is for a more realistic present day valuation of very long term projects combined with fluctuating metal prices - so you are half right.

What I am trying to say, Teck or any operator, would prefer a project that can operate in some of the worst of markets without losing money and having to shut down. DL said just as much in an interview last year ( or was it longer lol!). A project with a low IRR is much better if the project can stay open and break even in poor economic times. Starting and stoping a mine with metal price cycles is difficult and expensive and can cost an operation much of its labour force if they chose to get more consistent paychecks elsewhere.

10
Feb 07, 2013 03:08PM
16
Feb 07, 2013 03:21PM
1
Feb 07, 2013 03:30PM
2
Feb 07, 2013 03:32PM
7
Feb 07, 2013 03:55PM
14
Feb 07, 2013 04:11PM
12
Feb 07, 2013 04:13PM
12
Feb 07, 2013 04:26PM
9
Feb 07, 2013 04:27PM
7
Feb 07, 2013 04:32PM

Feb 07, 2013 05:13PM
2
Feb 07, 2013 05:36PM
11
Feb 07, 2013 06:36PM
18
Feb 07, 2013 07:48PM
3
Feb 07, 2013 08:27PM
40
Feb 07, 2013 09:10PM
2
Feb 07, 2013 09:16PM
20
Feb 07, 2013 11:50PM

Feb 08, 2013 12:01AM
17
Feb 08, 2013 09:46AM

Feb 08, 2013 10:07AM

Feb 08, 2013 10:45AM
8
Feb 08, 2013 01:26PM
14
Feb 08, 2013 10:20PM
5
Feb 08, 2013 10:57PM
3
Feb 09, 2013 09:48AM
12
Feb 09, 2013 10:51AM
11
Feb 09, 2013 01:58PM
5
Feb 09, 2013 02:09PM
12
Feb 09, 2013 03:27PM
12
Feb 09, 2013 03:38PM
10
Feb 09, 2013 04:01PM
7
Feb 09, 2013 04:11PM
6
Feb 09, 2013 04:58PM
9
Feb 09, 2013 05:07PM
4
Feb 09, 2013 05:57PM
5
Feb 09, 2013 06:48PM
12
Feb 09, 2013 07:32PM
1
Feb 09, 2013 07:47PM
9
Feb 09, 2013 07:51PM
1
Feb 10, 2013 01:55PM
9
Feb 10, 2013 04:09PM
2
Feb 10, 2013 04:31PM
2
Feb 10, 2013 05:06PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply