Welcome To the Copper Fox Metals Inc. HUB On AGORACOM

CUU own 25% Schaft Creek: proven/probable min. reserves/940.8m tonnes = 0.27% copper, 0.19 g/t gold, 0.018% moly and 1.72 g/t silver containing: 5.6b lbs copper, 5.8m ounces gold, 363.5m lbs moly and 51.7m ounces silver; (Recoverable CuEq 0.46%)

Free
Message: Re: Not Good
9
Feb 07, 2013 10:33AM
9
Feb 07, 2013 10:34AM
18
Feb 07, 2013 10:46AM
3
Feb 07, 2013 10:56AM
10
Feb 07, 2013 11:01AM
22
Feb 07, 2013 11:02AM
5
Feb 07, 2013 11:11AM
4
Feb 07, 2013 11:14AM
4
Feb 07, 2013 11:18AM
32
Feb 07, 2013 11:23AM
4
Feb 07, 2013 11:27AM
6
Feb 07, 2013 11:36AM
8
Feb 07, 2013 11:39AM
3
Feb 07, 2013 11:43AM
13
Feb 07, 2013 11:43AM
17
Feb 07, 2013 11:53AM
3
Feb 07, 2013 12:26PM
10
Feb 07, 2013 03:08PM
16
Feb 07, 2013 03:21PM
1
Feb 07, 2013 03:30PM
2
Feb 07, 2013 03:32PM
7
Feb 07, 2013 03:55PM
14
Feb 07, 2013 04:11PM
12
Feb 07, 2013 04:13PM
12
Feb 07, 2013 04:26PM
9
Feb 07, 2013 04:27PM
7
Feb 07, 2013 04:32PM

Feb 07, 2013 05:13PM
2
Feb 07, 2013 05:36PM
11
Feb 07, 2013 06:36PM
18
Feb 07, 2013 07:48PM
3
Feb 07, 2013 08:27PM
40
Feb 07, 2013 09:10PM
2
Feb 07, 2013 09:16PM
20
Feb 07, 2013 11:50PM

Feb 08, 2013 12:01AM

Webgogs: "We knew it was there and not worth drilling......Mark my words, it's not waste. But a huge drilling program would be a waste."

I understand it isn't waste, but we treat it as waste as we don't have a the resource category to deem it mill run ore. The Dec 21st NR on the FS states that drilling this 'waste' as a project enhancement:

Project Enhancements

The Feasibility Study makes recommendations for further development of the project that could enhance the economics of Schaft Creek including:

  1. Copper Fox undertakes a diamond drilling program at Schaft Creek with a goal to determine the extent to which the 171.16 million tonnes of inferred resource, that lie within the pit shell, can be upgraded to a Measured or Indicated Resource. To the degree such a program is successful it will remove the affected material from being categorized as a rock removal expense to an ore bearing material and as such, a revenue generator;

IIRC, Elmer repeated much the same during the Dec 24th conference call and described the waste as an opportunity and that it would be drilled if we have a drill programme this year. In his email to myself, he said this: "I would say the identification of the inferred resource should be considered a positive in that it is now treated as appoint to improve the project economics."

By "appoint" I believe he means "a point".

The FS summary recommendations for Phase I (page 26-2) suggests that the 9 drill holes would only cost $1,819,000 for all the infill driling. That doesn't sound like a lot of money for the impact it would have on the economics.

(Interesting that the first recommendation is to complete the Titan work between GK and ES zone - outside of the FS scope AND was to be completed in Phase I of our 2012 exploration programme ??)

So, TT and Elmer don't think it would be 'a waste' to drill the 171M tonnes to improve the economics and it doesn't appear to be a huge drilling programme or a lot of money. I guess we'll only really know if there is a 2013 programme at Schaft and we drill as recommended.


Feb 08, 2013 10:07AM

Feb 08, 2013 10:45AM
8
Feb 08, 2013 01:26PM
14
Feb 08, 2013 10:20PM
5
Feb 08, 2013 10:57PM
3
Feb 09, 2013 09:48AM
12
Feb 09, 2013 10:51AM
11
Feb 09, 2013 01:58PM
5
Feb 09, 2013 02:09PM
12
Feb 09, 2013 03:27PM
12
Feb 09, 2013 03:38PM
10
Feb 09, 2013 04:01PM
7
Feb 09, 2013 04:11PM
6
Feb 09, 2013 04:58PM
9
Feb 09, 2013 05:07PM
4
Feb 09, 2013 05:57PM
5
Feb 09, 2013 06:48PM
12
Feb 09, 2013 07:32PM
1
Feb 09, 2013 07:47PM
9
Feb 09, 2013 07:51PM
1
Feb 10, 2013 01:55PM
9
Feb 10, 2013 04:09PM
2
Feb 10, 2013 04:31PM
2
Feb 10, 2013 05:06PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply