Welcome To the Copper Fox Metals Inc. HUB On AGORACOM

CUU own 25% Schaft Creek: proven/probable min. reserves/940.8m tonnes = 0.27% copper, 0.19 g/t gold, 0.018% moly and 1.72 g/t silver containing: 5.6b lbs copper, 5.8m ounces gold, 363.5m lbs moly and 51.7m ounces silver; (Recoverable CuEq 0.46%)

Free
Message: Re: Not Good
9
Feb 07, 2013 10:33AM
9
Feb 07, 2013 10:34AM
18
Feb 07, 2013 10:46AM
3
Feb 07, 2013 10:56AM
10
Feb 07, 2013 11:01AM
22
Feb 07, 2013 11:02AM
5
Feb 07, 2013 11:11AM
4
Feb 07, 2013 11:14AM
4
Feb 07, 2013 11:18AM
32
Feb 07, 2013 11:23AM
4
Feb 07, 2013 11:27AM
6
Feb 07, 2013 11:36AM
8
Feb 07, 2013 11:39AM
3
Feb 07, 2013 11:43AM
13
Feb 07, 2013 11:43AM
17
Feb 07, 2013 11:53AM
3
Feb 07, 2013 12:26PM
10
Feb 07, 2013 03:08PM
16
Feb 07, 2013 03:21PM
1
Feb 07, 2013 03:30PM
2
Feb 07, 2013 03:32PM
7
Feb 07, 2013 03:55PM
14
Feb 07, 2013 04:11PM
12
Feb 07, 2013 04:13PM
12
Feb 07, 2013 04:26PM
9
Feb 07, 2013 04:27PM
7
Feb 07, 2013 04:32PM

Feb 07, 2013 05:13PM
2
Feb 07, 2013 05:36PM
11
Feb 07, 2013 06:36PM
18
Feb 07, 2013 07:48PM
3
Feb 07, 2013 08:27PM

Forget about last year or the year before or the year before that. This 171M tonnes of waste is in Liard zone where we havent done much drilling since...2008 maybe before? I would not be surprised if this inferred was around from pre 2002.

Shouldn't we have known that the 'waste' would have been a dead weight on the economic model of any FS? Not being able to incorp the inferred into a FS as mill run ore isn't a rule that fell from the sky last year.

I dont' know if we got caught up chasing higher grades and hoped that those would carry the day but our whole mission in life with this company was to produce a FS with good economics to maximize the value of the deposit and the company and make it easy to sell. Leaving mineralized material to be treated as waste doesn't seem like a good idea by any stretch.

Now we are wishing that 171M tonnes was Measured or Indicated and raising money to drill it with our current SP range will cost us a heck of a lot more dilution that last summer or the summer before. Elmer is characterizing this waste as an opportunity going forward. That's one way to look at it. I see it as a missed opportunity.

Yes I did ask ES about this very issue. I found the response defensive, evasive and unconvincing. I've shared that correspondence with some others more capable than myself and they shared an equal assessment.

I want to believe that this is all part of a great master plan and full value for every bit of inferred and potential will be realized despite the lack of assays. Elmer's words loom large on that notion though, as he himself said only drills can demonstrate mineralization.

No, I can't sell and move on; the many repeated missed deadlines and broken promises coupled with the corresponding SP erosion have left me underwater and forced to bear this thru to the bitter end. I think I'll come out positive but probably not the multibagger I was origionally anticipating and I'm not counting the extra years it has taken to get to that outcome.

I'm trying to see the positives here. Please dont' tell me that the mineralized waste is one of them - because it defintitely isn't.

2
Feb 07, 2013 09:16PM
20
Feb 07, 2013 11:50PM

Feb 08, 2013 12:01AM
17
Feb 08, 2013 09:46AM

Feb 08, 2013 10:07AM

Feb 08, 2013 10:45AM
8
Feb 08, 2013 01:26PM
14
Feb 08, 2013 10:20PM
5
Feb 08, 2013 10:57PM
3
Feb 09, 2013 09:48AM
12
Feb 09, 2013 10:51AM
11
Feb 09, 2013 01:58PM
5
Feb 09, 2013 02:09PM
12
Feb 09, 2013 03:27PM
12
Feb 09, 2013 03:38PM
10
Feb 09, 2013 04:01PM
7
Feb 09, 2013 04:11PM
6
Feb 09, 2013 04:58PM
9
Feb 09, 2013 05:07PM
4
Feb 09, 2013 05:57PM
5
Feb 09, 2013 06:48PM
12
Feb 09, 2013 07:32PM
1
Feb 09, 2013 07:47PM
9
Feb 09, 2013 07:51PM
1
Feb 10, 2013 01:55PM
9
Feb 10, 2013 04:09PM
2
Feb 10, 2013 04:31PM
2
Feb 10, 2013 05:06PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply