Re: Not Good-WG
in response to
by
posted on
Feb 08, 2013 01:26PM
CUU own 25% Schaft Creek: proven/probable min. reserves/940.8m tonnes = 0.27% copper, 0.19 g/t gold, 0.018% moly and 1.72 g/t silver containing: 5.6b lbs copper, 5.8m ounces gold, 363.5m lbs moly and 51.7m ounces silver; (Recoverable CuEq 0.46%)
This is what this year's drilling program will be about. Brechia hunting. When you read the full document it illuminates a number of targets. There are enough high priority targets with 1:1's to keep us busy for an entire season with 4 drills. I'd suggest dilute and put 10 drills on it and get it over with.
"The chargeability models generally display a very low chargeability in the eastern part of the grid. In the western part of the grid the chargeability crossâsections display elevated chargeability in an area associated with Main, West Breccia, and Paramount Zones. The southern portion of the western part of the grid illustrates a highly chargeable subsurface that extend beyond the survey grid. The two southernmost lines (L800S and L400S) surveyed in the phase II of the Schaft Creek project revealed a large and highly chargeable area." http://www.copperfoxmetals.com/s/Image.asp?i=maps/2012_DDH_LOCATION_MAP.jpg&id=546483
This has been a subject of debate with ES. To the left of L440S we drilled the step down and didn't get much (DDHAS16 area) but over to the right there's an untouched one that apparently got some field work. More to the south got field work but no new drilling. I think it needs work too. http://www.copperfoxmetals.com/s/Image.asp?i=maps/3D-CHARGEABILITY-15mrad_Block_Mod[2].jpg&id=485514
And then from the phase two work
"A total of 31 potential targets with different priority levels have been resolved along the survey lines surveyed in phase III of the Schaft Creek project"
While these don't appear to be giant hits, neither did Discovery.