Welcome To the Copper Fox Metals Inc. HUB On AGORACOM

CUU own 25% Schaft Creek: proven/probable min. reserves/940.8m tonnes = 0.27% copper, 0.19 g/t gold, 0.018% moly and 1.72 g/t silver containing: 5.6b lbs copper, 5.8m ounces gold, 363.5m lbs moly and 51.7m ounces silver; (Recoverable CuEq 0.46%)

Free
Message: Re: Right by the xxxxs
Reply New Message
Back To Forum List View
Not Good
9
Russ Reid
Feb 07, 2013 10:33AM
Re: Not Good
9
BurningRoF
Feb 07, 2013 10:34AM
Re: Not Good - Russ
18
Pat66
Feb 07, 2013 10:46AM
Re: Not Good - Russ
3
sydneyb
Feb 07, 2013 10:56AM
Re: Not Good - Russ
10
bostrin
Feb 07, 2013 11:01AM
Re: Not Good
22
Metacomet
Feb 07, 2013 11:02AM
Re: Not Good -- Russ Reid
5
Richy7
Feb 07, 2013 11:11AM
Re: Not Good
4
Pat66
Feb 07, 2013 11:14AM
Re: Not Good - Russ
4
Investorish
Feb 07, 2013 11:18AM
Re: Not Good
32
cbew
Feb 07, 2013 11:23AM
Re: Not Good - Investorish
4
Pat66
Feb 07, 2013 11:27AM
Re: Not Good - Investorish

Investorish
Feb 07, 2013 11:33AM
Re: Not Good
6
BurningRoF
Feb 07, 2013 11:36AM
Re: Not Good
8
Metacomet
Feb 07, 2013 11:39AM
Re: Not Good
3
mahzman2
Feb 07, 2013 11:43AM
Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
13
Pat66
Feb 07, 2013 11:43AM
Re: Not Good
17
cbew
Feb 07, 2013 11:53AM
Icon president Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
15
Chappy726
Feb 07, 2013 12:10PM
Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
4
Foxyroller
Feb 07, 2013 12:25PM
Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
3
Pat66
Feb 07, 2013 12:26PM
Icon president Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
8
Chappy726
Feb 07, 2013 12:43PM
Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
7
Skibum2
Feb 07, 2013 02:50PM
Re: Not Good - cbew
10
hoghead
Feb 07, 2013 03:08PM
Re: Not Good - cbew
16
cbew
Feb 07, 2013 03:21PM
Re: Not Good - well imo
1
sydneyb
Feb 07, 2013 03:30PM
Re: SP Premiums
2
deeppocket83
Feb 07, 2013 03:32PM
Re: SP Premiums
7
hoghead
Feb 07, 2013 03:55PM
Icon president Re: SP Premiums
14
Chappy726
Feb 07, 2013 04:11PM
Re: SP Premiums
12
Metacomet
Feb 07, 2013 04:13PM
Re: SP Premiums
12
cbew
Feb 07, 2013 04:26PM
Re: SP Premiums
9
calvin123456789
Feb 07, 2013 04:27PM
Re: SP Premiums
7
hoghead
Feb 07, 2013 04:32PM
Re: SP Premiums

orangepeel
Feb 07, 2013 05:13PM
Re: SP Premiums
2
neofight
Feb 07, 2013 05:36PM
Re: SP Premiums
11
calvin123456789
Feb 07, 2013 06:36PM
Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
4
Brad129a
Feb 07, 2013 07:02PM
Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
18
cbew
Feb 07, 2013 07:48PM
Icon president Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
31
Prospekt
Feb 07, 2013 08:06PM
Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
26
mcsweep
Feb 07, 2013 08:10PM
Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
3
cbew
Feb 07, 2013 08:27PM
Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
16
Metacomet
Feb 07, 2013 08:39PM
Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.

Liddy77
Feb 07, 2013 08:47PM
Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
8
Metacomet
Feb 07, 2013 09:01PM
Icon president Re: Not Good
40
Chappy726
Feb 07, 2013 09:10PM
Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
11
Metacomet
Feb 07, 2013 09:14PM
Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
2
Pat66
Feb 07, 2013 09:16PM
Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
2
Nav2006
Feb 07, 2013 09:22PM
Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
5
treborjim
Feb 07, 2013 10:32PM
Re: Not Good at First Glance - But Look at what is recommended!
7
RabidTiger
Feb 07, 2013 11:49PM
Icon president Re: Not Good
20
webgogs
Feb 07, 2013 11:50PM
Re: Not Good

simc1
Feb 08, 2013 12:01AM
Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
29
CanadaGrant
Feb 08, 2013 12:40AM
Icon president Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
3
stockfriend
Feb 08, 2013 09:38AM
Icon president Re: Not Good
17
Chappy726
Feb 08, 2013 09:46AM
Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
14
treborjim
Feb 08, 2013 10:00AM
Re: Not Good - WG

Pat66
Feb 08, 2013 10:07AM
Re: Not Good - Investorish and al. Trebor

Pat66
Feb 08, 2013 10:17AM
Re: Not Good-WG

kupper
Feb 08, 2013 10:45AM
Icon president Re: Not Good-WG
8
webgogs
Feb 08, 2013 01:26PM
Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
7
Brad129a
Feb 08, 2013 09:45PM
Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
5
cuushareholder
Feb 08, 2013 09:49PM
Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
14
cbew
Feb 08, 2013 10:20PM
Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
18
RabidTiger
Feb 08, 2013 10:30PM
Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
16
hoghead
Feb 08, 2013 10:35PM
Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
5
cbew
Feb 08, 2013 10:57PM
Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
8
hoghead
Feb 08, 2013 11:14PM
Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
17
venturevestor
Feb 08, 2013 11:36PM
Icon president Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
2
stockfriend
Feb 08, 2013 11:47PM
Right by the xxxxs
3
orangepeel
Feb 09, 2013 09:48AM
Icon president Re: Right by the xxxxs
12
stockfriend
Feb 09, 2013 10:51AM
Icon president Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
10
webgogs
Feb 09, 2013 12:14PM
Re: Right by the xxxxs
11
Orcinus
Feb 09, 2013 01:58PM
Re: Right by the xxxxs
5
calvin123456789
Feb 09, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Right by the xxxxs
12
Metacomet
Feb 09, 2013 03:27PM
Re: Right by the xxxxs
12
cbew
Feb 09, 2013 03:38PM
Icon president Re: Right by the xxxxs
10
chunkytoast
Feb 09, 2013 04:01PM
Re: Right by the xxxxs
7
RabidTiger
Feb 09, 2013 04:11PM
Re: Right by the xxxxs
6
Metacomet
Feb 09, 2013 04:58PM

I don't think Teck will object either. I suspect part of the reason for the Merit review was to save a few extra dollars to make the post tax NPV positive. Keep in mind that every dollar saved on capex is another dollar of NPV.

9 Recommendations
Icon president Re: Right by the xxxxs
4
chunkytoast
Feb 09, 2013 05:57PM
Icon president Re: Right by the xxxxs
5
stockfriend
Feb 09, 2013 06:48PM
Re: Right by the xxxxs
12
RabidTiger
Feb 09, 2013 07:32PM
Icon president Re: Right by the xxxxs
1
stockfriend
Feb 09, 2013 07:47PM
Re: Right by the xxxxs
9
mahzman2
Feb 09, 2013 07:51PM
Re: Not Good-WG
1
kupper
Feb 10, 2013 01:55PM
Icon president Re: Not Good-WG
9
Chappy726
Feb 10, 2013 04:09PM
Re: Not Good-WG
2
kupper
Feb 10, 2013 04:31PM
Re: Not Good-WG
2
orangepeel
Feb 10, 2013 05:06PM
Reply New Message
Back To Forum List View
Share
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply